Bruins after dark

After a season that never quite clicked, the Boston Bruins are facing some hard decisions — and one of them might involve Jeremy Swayman.

Once thought to be the long-term answer in net, his future in Boston is suddenly uncertain.

Multiple sources around the league have indicated that the Bruins are at least open to discussing a potential deal involving Swayman.

The chatter picked up after NHL insider Elliotte Friedman mentioned on air that Boston may be evaluating their options before Swayman’s no-movement clause takes effect in 2026.

It’s something Boston will have to at least consider, especially if they want flexibility ahead of that clause kicking in,

Friedman said.

Swayman didn’t have a disastrous season, but he wasn’t where the Bruins needed him to be, either.

The team’s defensive structure had its issues, sure, but the lack of consistency in goal didn’t help.

For a team used to being in the mix, missing the playoffs has forced a closer look at all positions — even goaltending.

Trading a starting goalie isn’t something teams take lightly, especially someone as young as Swayman.

But if the front office believes they’ve plateaued with the current setup, it might be time to look elsewhere.

Joonas Korpisalo not hiding his intentions

It wasn’t just the coaching staff or fans who felt the imbalance.

Joonas Korpisalo, who spent much of the season as the backup, made it clear during exit interviews that he wants more time in the crease.

I don’t think there’s any goalie in the league who’s comfortable playing 20-25 games, Korpisalo told reporters.

I’m gonna push for more games, for sure.

If Swayman gets moved, Korpisalo stands to benefit immediately.

But whether the Bruins see him as a long-term solution or just a stopgap remains to be seen.

There’s another layer to this: timing.

With Swayman’s contract containing a no-movement clause starting in 2026, Boston may feel the clock ticking if they want to make a move without restrictions.

They also have cap considerations and roster depth to juggle, especially if they hope to stay competitive next season.

Letting Swayman walk for nothing down the line would sting — which is why the idea of getting value now is more than just rumor-mill fluff.

It’s a real conversation inside the front office.

Is this goodbye — or a message? 

Trading Swayman would send a strong message: no one is untouchable. And maybe, after a season like this, that’s exactly what the Bruins need to say. Whether the move happens or not, the fact that it’s on the table speaks volumes.

Would letting Swayman go be bold or reckless? Bruins fans may soon find out.